When Justice Knocks and Politics Hides: Why Starmer’s Snub of Yunus Was a Blown Moment
14 June 2025
Over $230 billion vanished from Bangladesh during Sheikh Hasina’s reign — enough to fund entire education systems, rebuild broken banks, and refill empty reserves. Instead, a sizable chunk of that loot ended up somewhere far more familiar: the United Kingdom, nestled in trust funds, shell companies, and swanky Central London flats.
The UK’s National Crime Agency has already frozen over £400 million in suspect assets. The Rahman family alone — Hasina loyalists — were sitting on up to £110 million worth of Mayfair real estate. Add in Tulip Siddiq, former anti-corruption minister and Hasina’s niece, and the hypocrisy writes itself.
The UK isn’t short of laws. What it’s short on — painfully and repeatedly — is backbone.
Which is why Professor Yunus’s visit to London mattered. As Bangladesh’s interim Chief Advisor, he wasn’t there for tea and crumpets. He came asking for real support: help tracing and returning money looted from his country’s people.
And Keir Starmer couldn’t be bothered to take the meeting.
That’s not just a diplomatic cold shoulder — that’s a political cop-out. Britain froze the assets. It knows the money’s dirty. But when it came time to speak to the victims’ representative? Silence. Door shut. Move along.
This was a golden chance to show the world that a post-Johnson, post-Sunak Britain was ready to clean house — not just talk about fighting corruption, but actually fight it. Instead, we got the same old hedging: legal theatre without moral clarity.
Let’s call it what it is — a missed opportunity, and a very public failure of political will.
If Britain wants to stop being the world’s favourite laundromat, it needs to start meeting the people trying to pull the plug. Starting with Dr Yunus

Comments
Post a Comment