A Question of Influence: PM Starmer and the Bangladesh Chief Adviser

12 June 2025



It's genuinely perplexing to see Keir Starmer, the UK Prime Minister, reportedly decline a meeting with Bangladesh's Chief Adviser, Muhammad Yunus. This isn't just a missed diplomatic opportunity; it raises a troubling question about the influences shaping Downing Street's foreign engagements. Could it be that the close ties between Starmer and his long-time colleague, Tulip Siddiq, are casting a long shadow over these crucial decisions?

Starmer and Siddiq's friendship is well-known. They entered Parliament in the same year, share neighboring London constituencies, and their professional relationship has blossomed into a close personal one, with reports even suggesting their families have holidayed together. It's natural for a Prime Minister to value trusted allies, but when those alliances appear to impact significant international relations, it invites scrutiny.

The former ruling party of Bangladesh, the Awami League, has openly voiced its "concern" over any potential meeting between Starmer and Yunus. This isn't subtle; it's a clear signal from a party that seemingly holds considerable sway, and whose leadership has faced significant corruption allegations in Bangladesh. The UK's own National Crime Agency has even frozen millions of pounds worth of London properties linked to key allies and family members of the former Awami League regime, underscoring the serious nature of these concerns.

Given this backdrop, Starmer's reported reluctance to engage with Bangladesh's interim administration feels less like a strategic diplomatic move and more like an avoidance. It suggests a cautiousness that might be rooted in the very strong opinions and loyalties within his inner circle. When a nation's leader seems to be influenced by personal connections, especially those as deep as shared family holidays, rather than the broader interests of international diplomacy and the pursuit of transparent governance, it can leave many feeling deeply frustrated.

The UK positions itself as a champion of democracy and good governance. Yet, when its Prime Minister appears to shy away from engaging with a new, interim administration, particularly one grappling with the aftermath of a regime now seeing its assets frozen in the UK, it sends a mixed message. It leads one to wonder if the comfort of familiar relationships is, perhaps inadvertently, outweighing the necessity of objective international engagement. This isn't just about a single meeting; it's about whether the integrity of British foreign policy can withstand the pull of personal allegiances.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Let This Be Her Medal: The Maherin Medal for Civilian Sacrifice

Image
23 July 2025 My cousin died in a tragedy. But the real tragedy is that Bangladesh has no name for women like her. Maherin wasn’t just a name I knew—she was family. My cousin. The daughter of my mother’s brother. Though life had stretched us across continents—me in the U.S., she in Bangladesh—we were growing close again. Since the political shift of 2024, I’d been spending more time in Dhaka. The nation was calling calling, and I finally found a small part to play. And as I returned more frequently, Maherin and I—like cousins often do—began to rediscover each other. It started with messages, then calls. Then came the day she invited the family to her home in Uttara. Our two aunts from North America were visiting, and with both our parents gone, Maherin saw the moment for what it was: a chance to gather what was left of us and stitch something whole again. I remember walking into her apartment and being hit by the smell of spices and home—the kind of scent that can stop time. For a few h...
Read more

From Resilience to Reinvention: Forging a New Era in U.S.-Bangladesh Relations

Image
15 July 2025 (Thank You Note & Closing remarks at the Congressional Briefing) Good morning, everyone. It’s a privilege to join you today—Congressman Doggett, Congressman McGovern, Ambassador Mozena, Michael Kugelman, and all our distinguished guests. Your presence speaks to a shared recognition: the future of U.S.-Bangladesh relations is a story still being written. Today, many have spoken about the crises we’ve faced. But as we close this gathering, I want to shift focus—from challenge to possibility, from reaction to reinvention. Because resilience is not enough. We need reinvention—rooted in economic sovereignty, democratic values, and strategic partnership between Bangladesh and the United States. Our objective is disarmingly simple, yet profoundly revolutionary: to cultivate a trade relationship that is not extractive, but inherently expansive. A relationship that is not merely transactional, but truly transformative. A Nation Moving Forward As Co-Chair of the Bangladesh Ameri...
Read more

Bloodlines of the Delta: Unearthing the Past Beneath Our Skin Part 1 of a Series — From Indus Civilization to the Rivers of Bengal

Image
20 June 2025 The rivers that carve through Bangladesh tell a story not just of water and land, but of human journeys spanning millennia. At the apex of the Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh has always been a crossroads—where people met, mingled, and moved on, leaving behind echoes in the soil and the skin, in memory and in blood. Here, history isn’t neatly buried. It seeps into daily life. Into how we cook. How we build. Even how we trade. We like to speak of ancient civilizations as if they’re finished—dead, dusted, and stored behind museum glass. But Michel Danino, Indian scholar of French origin and author of The Lost River, throws a quiet challenge at that idea: What if the Indus Valley Civilization never really ended? Danino has spent decades chasing the traces of the Harappan world—its bricks, its beads, its buried rivers. And his conclusion is simple but profound: the Indus didn’t vanish. It survived. Not in pyramids or palaces, but in the unnoticed—mud homes, kitchen habits, local craf...
Read more